This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
lhc_inverse [2008/04/24 18:31] jthaler |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== The LHC Inverse Problem ====== | ||
| - | ===== MARMOSET ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | //Fall 2006 - Spring 2007// | ||
| - | |||
| - | * **MARMOSET: The Path from LHC Data to the New Standard Model via On-Shell Effective Theories**.\\ Nima Arkani-Hamed, Bruce Knuteson, Stephen Mrenna, Philip Schuster, Jesse Thaler, Natalia Toro, and Lian-Tao Wang. \\ [[http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0703088|hep-ph/0703088]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== SUSY and the LHC Inverse Problem ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | //Summer/Fall 2005// | ||
| - | |||
| - | The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) is one of the leading candidates for a theory beyond the standard model. The MSSM predicts a new supersymmetric partner particle for every standard model particle, effectively doubling the known number of fundamental states. | ||
| - | |||
| - | In principle, the spectrum of these partner states can yield information about the ultraviolet structure of the standard model. However, we found that given a generic strategy for analyzing LHC data, there are often discrete ambiguities in trying to determine the pattern of supersymmetric states. Moreover, these ambiguities are difficult to identify, because they correspond to drastically rearranging the MSSM spectrum. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * **Supersymmetry and the LHC Inverse Problem**.\\ Nima Arkani-Hamed, Gordon L. Kane, Jesse Thaler, and Lian-Tao Wang.\\ [[http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1126-6708/2006/08/070|JHEP 0608:070 (2006)]] [[http://www.arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0512190|hep-ph/0512190]]. | ||